(The Alleged COVID-Vaccine Child Death Cover-Up No One Can Get a Straight Answer On)
Some stories start with a whistleblower.
Some start with a leaked memo.
And some… start when the nation’s top vaccine regulator looks at his own agency’s data and says:
“Houston… we have a problem.”
I’m Dr. Kristen Lindgren, and welcome back to The Dysfunction Files.
Today’s episode: The deaths that were never supposed to happen.
Or maybe… the ones we were never supposed to find out about.
Because every now and then, the truth doesn’t slip out – it escapes.
And once it does, no amount of redaction ink can put it back in.
Let’s get into it.
THE MEMO THAT WASN’T SUPPOSED TO EXIST
In late 2024, something happened inside the FDA that almost nobody saw coming.
According to multiple major news outlets – including Reuters, STAT News, and The Guardian – a senior FDA official allegedly circulated an internal memo raising concerns about possible COVID-vaccine-related pediatric deaths.
Not a fringe blogger.
Not a “disinformation influencer.”
But the director of the FDA’s biologics division – Dr. Vinay Prasad.
And the memo he’s reported to have written… was not subtle.
As covered in the media, it allegedly stated that at least ten pediatric deaths may have been linked to myocarditis following COVID vaccination — with language described as “probable” and “likely.”
Not “rare theoretical concern.”
Not “data insufficient.”
Not “we’ll get back to you on that.”
Probable.
Likely.
Terms regulators almost never use.
This same memo – again, as reported – called the situation a “profound revelation” and suggested sweeping changes to how vaccines are tested and approved going forward.
If that doesn’t make your eyebrows levitate straight off your face and into orbit, check your pulse.
Now – let’s be clear. The risk of myocarditis after COVID vaccination isn’t new. We’ve known about that for years.
It’s been openly discussed by the FDA, CDC, cardiologists, pediatric hospitals – everybody.
And the reassurance was always the same:
“Yes we’ve seen it but, it’s rare. And when it does happen, it’s usually mild. It resolves on its own. Maybe some NSAIDs, maybe a short hospitalization, but kids do fine.”
What we were not told – by any agency, at any point – is that myocarditis might be connected to fatal outcomes in children.
That’s the part of this memo where the math isn’t mathing.
Within days:
–Reuters reported the memo’s existence
–STAT News covered internal FDA disruption
–The Guardian expressed alarm at the language
–Former FDA commissioners issued public statements of concern
-And the FDA – after years of assuring the public the data showed no cause for alarm – announced that it was formally investigating these claims
You don’t get that sequence unless something very serious is happening behind closed doors.
Because if you’ve ever studied regulatory history, you know:
Agencies don’t panic over hypotheticals.
They panic when something real surfaces –
even if the public can’t see it yet.
WHAT WE KNOW, AND WHAT WE DON’T (4:00–10:00)
This is the part where the story turns into a clinical-grade mess.
Because here’s the kicker:
The memo exists… but the details do not. Trust me – I’ve looked.
There’s no:
-names
-ages
-medical histories
-autopsies
-causality chains
-timelines
-breakdown of vaccine brand, dose, or surrounding events
It’s like someone is waving a sealed envelope and saying:
“I swear there’s something world-shaking inside, but you’re not allowed to see it.”
Meanwhile — the agency that spent three years assuring the public these vaccines were the safest thing ever invented by humans, surpassing even herbal tea and bubble wrap –
is now quietly reviewing what some reports have described as possible vaccine-related deaths across all age groups.
All.
Age.
Groups.
Oh.
And ACIP – the same committee that has never met a vaccine it wasn’t married to – just dropped the universal newborn Hep B birth dose for the first time in 30 years as we reviewed in last week’s episode.
Coincidence?
Or “we should probably look like we’re paying attention” damage control?
THE DOGS THAT AREN’T BARKING
Let’s talk about what’s missing – because missing evidence is its own kind of evidence.
Independent researchers?
No access.
Data transparency?
Nope.
Peer review?
Try again.
The guy who wrote the memo?
Not answering questions.
The agency responsible for the safety signal?
Doing the bureaucratic version of speed-walking past reporters with a stack of papers in front of their face.
Scientists are screaming:
“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”
And the FDA is responding:
“We’ll get back to you… never.”
Meanwhile, the media has split into two parallel universes:
World A:
“This is a conspiracy theory. Probably. Maybe. We think. Please don’t unsubscribe to our channel.”
World B:
“Why is the FDA acting like it just discovered fire… but refuses to show anyone the flames?”
And as you know:
– Institutions lie
-Government is corrupt
-Industry profits when you’re sick
-“Science” is sponsored
-Transparency optional
-Accountability negotiable
-Dysfunction everywhere
You see?
This is why we can’t have nice things.
THE BERENSON FILES – “WHEN THE NUMBERS DON’T ADD UP”
And just when the story starts feeling like it couldn’t get any deeper – Alex Berenson enters the chat.
The man who has spent four years screaming into the digital void, waving VAERS charts like an Old Testament prophet, looks at this FDA memo and says:
‘Congratulations, you’ve finally admitted the part we already knew.’
Because to him, this isn’t a revelation.
It’s evidence of a cover-up under stress.
Ten pediatric deaths?
He says that’s the floor.
No autopsies?
He says that’s the tell.
And the memo’s timing – right as federal agencies scramble, public trust collapses, and committees quietly reverse old recommendations –
He says that’s not coincidence.
That’s…
narrative management.”
THE ‘MAYBE-SCANDAL’ IN PROGRESS
Here’s the truth:
This is not a solved mystery.
This is not a clear-cut “vaccines may have killed children” conclusion.
This is also not a nothingburger.
It’s an ongoing federal investigation triggered by an internal safety memo written by the highest-ranking vaccine official in the agency.
This is not fringe.
This is not a rumor on Reddit.
This is not that guy on Telegram who films his videos on a potato.
This is the FDA.
The same agency that approved the shots.
The same agency that said the shots never caused any child deaths.
The same agency now investigating whether they did.
And all of that – all of it – while refusing to show the data. Dude this memo leaked like two weeks ago – I’ve been waiting patiently to cover it. Forget it. Moving on.
If this were any other medical product – an herb, a supplement, a peptide, a pill, a probiotic, a CHOCOLATE BAR – it would’ve been recalled faster than you can say “adverse event.”
But vaccines?
Ah, yes.
Different rulebook.
Different universe.
Different physics.
And ever since Congress passed the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act — the law that shields vaccine manufacturers from liability — the system has played by a completely different set of incentives. When you can’t be sued, “safety” becomes a paperwork problem, not a priority.
WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN NEXT
Here’s what it will take to turn this story from “alleged” to “documented”:
- Full data release – cause of death, autopsy findings, timing relative to dose.
- Independent verification – outside pathologists, statisticians, epidemiologists.
- Clear explanation of methodology – how “probable causality” was determined.
- Transparency hearings – Congressional oversight has already begun sniffing around.
- Policy changes – either to confirm risk or admit uncertainty.
And here is the uncomfortable truth:
If the FDA sits on this data, it becomes a scandal.
If the FDA releases the data, and it supports causality, it becomes a catastrophe.
If the FDA releases the data and it doesn’t support causality, then someone inside the agency wrote the most explosive memo in vaccine history… to what? collect unemployment?
Either way – the public deserves answers.
CLOSING
This story is not over.
It’s not resolved.
It’s not confirmed.
It’s not debunked.
It’s unfolding in real time.
A top regulator says deaths happened.
The agency refuses to show the data.
The mainstream media can’t agree on whether the story is real.
And the public is left staring into the void like:
“…so are we gonna talk about this or what?”
Welcome to modern medicine, folks.
Where transparency is optional.
Where accountability is negotiable.
Where “trust the science” apparently doesn’t include reading any of the science.
And so, as always, we end with the only promise this show can make:
I’ll follow the story.
I’ll read the documents.
I’ll watch the hearings.
And for the record – if anything weird happens to me, it wasn’t “an accident.”
And when the truth comes out – because it always does –
you’ll hear it here first.
